
He lived at Down House in Kent, England, where he did experiments, kept extensive notes and specimens, and wrote many of his later books.
Earlier thinkers had suggested species change over time. Darwin gathered extensive evidence and explained a clear mechanism for how that change could occur, strengthening the idea.
He argued that humans share common ancestry with other animals and examined how human traits could have evolved, which prompted major public discussion.
No. The modern science of genetics developed after Darwin. Mendel's experiments were not widely known to him, so heredity was not fully understood in his time.
Responses varied: some scientists quickly accepted his evidence-based approach, while others and many religious groups resisted. Acceptance grew as more supporting evidence accumulated.
No. Wallace independently reached a similar explanation. Their findings were presented jointly, and Darwin acknowledged Wallace’s contribution.
He began with conventional religious beliefs but gradually moved toward agnosticism, troubled by suffering and questions that science raised for him.
He wrote on variation under domestication, emotional expression in animals, plant behavior and pollination, human evolution topics, and even the role of earthworms in soil.
That exact phrase was coined by philosopher Herbert Spencer; Darwin later adopted it in some editions but originally explained his ideas with different wording and careful detail.